SEC-i Gensleril pole Ripple'i või XRP kohta palju öelda... peale selle

Allikasõlm: 1610015

. Gary Gensler-led Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has repeatedly aired its concerns about kohapeal Bitcoin Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs). In fact, the Chairman believes there is a lack of infrastructure designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices. According to the agency, this wouldn’t serve the SEC’s intent to protect investors and public interest.

See on kõik, mida ma palun

In a recent interview with Fox Business, Gensler again put forward his perspective given the growing uncertainty on the regulatory front. Especially since different applicants or funds including Halltoonid, Vaněček, etc. haven’t satisfied the requirements of the regulatory watchdogs.

Gensler reiterated his position this time around, märkides, “I continue to say, come in work with the SEC, register under the securities laws.”

"See on tõenäosusega kaalutud, kuid teie platvormil on 75 või 500 või 1000 märki. On üsna ebatõenäoline, et ükski neist pole (a) turvaline.

For a Bitcoin ETF to win the day, its issuer must establish what the SEC calls a “surveillance sharing agreement” with another major, compliance-minded market upon which the asset trades. Bitcoin Futures trading on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CM laiendus) seemingly fit this model.

Gensleri sõnul on CME-l olnud reguleeritud turg alates 2017. aastast. Vastupidi, viimasel (Spot ETF) ei ole ilmselt päris alusvara raamistikku.

Having said that, different critics of BTC Futures ETFs have pointed the possibility of using them for pricing — as opposed to spot Bitcoin. This could lead to underperformance. Futures tend to trade at a premium to the underlying asset, though they could trade at a discount.

SEK v. Ripple

The SEC have pursued Ripple over claims that XRP is an ‘registreerimata turvalisus‘. On the contrary, Ethereum was granted a regulatory green light, with ETH now well kaaluda as being not a security.

When asked about the same in the aforementioned interview, Gensler keeldus to comment in depth. However, he did say that, “the conceptual framework was the public investing money, anticipating profits, on the efforts of others.” He added,

„Avaliku emissiooni poolelt raha kogumine on täieliku ja õiglase avalikustamise ning pettustevastase kaitse põhileping. Ja registreerite end riigiasutuses nimega Väärtpaberi- ja Börsikomisjon ja see on tegelikult see, mida me teha püüame, on aidata seda põhilist tehingut jätkata.

SECi juhataja lisas,

„Oleme tehnoloogianeutraalsed, kui inimesed tahavad sellesse valdkonda investeerida või spekuleerida. Siis need märgid ja mis kõige tähtsam – platvormid, kuhu kauplemis- ja laenuplatvormid sisenevad, registreerivad, teevad seda seaduse piires, mitte ei ürita seadust mööda hiilida.

Erinevad Twitteri kasutajad ei ole nende vastustega rahul. Näiteks, Liz Hoffman, Wall Street Journali tegevjuht, usub, et Gensler heidab varju krüptofirmadele.

Ajatempel:

Veel alates AMB krüpto