Tožba XRP: Odziv datotek Ripple na predlog pisma SEC, ki prisili odkrivanje avdio-vizualnih podatkov

The latest development in the ongoing XRP lawsuit saw the defendants file a response to SEC’s letter motion compelling discovery of Ripple’s internal meetings’ audio-visual recordings. However, Ripple revealed that the compelled data is already under-production, and marked SEC’s Motion to Compel as “Not Ripe for Judicial Determination”.

#XRPSkupnost #SECGov v. # Valovanje #XRP Ripple has filed its Response to the SEC’s Motion to Compel Turnover of Video and Audio Recordings of Ripple Staff Meetings.https://t.co/H8Ys2kjArf

- James K. Filan 🇺🇸🇮🇪 (@FilanLaw) September 7, 2021

“Contrary to the SEC’s claim that the parties are at an impasse about those recordings, prior to the SEC even filing its Motion to Compel, Ripple had already agreed to the SEC’s request and has already begun producing such recordings. In fact, we expect Ripple’s production to be substantially complete before this motion is fully briefed.”, navedla in Ripple’s response letter to the court.

Ripple SEC obtožuje "slabo zasnovane gibalne prakse"

Ripple argued against the SEC filing further Motions to compel discovery, highlighting that the fact discovery phase has now ended. The defendant also discredits the SEC motion to compel discovery as an “ill-conceived motion practice concerning an issue that is not even ripe for adjudication”.

Ripple argued that the plaintiff could have easily chosen to meet and confer if it had any remaining issues with the ongoing audio-visual recordings’ discovery, instead of filing invalid motions. Ripple expects the Court to deny SEC’s motion as moot as there are no outstanding requests for recordings currently in dispute. Furthermore, Ripple appealed to the court to defer consideration of any future requests by the SEC for additional recordings unless the parties end up in an actual impasse situation.

Ripple poudarja pozno zahtevo SEC za produkcijo posnetkov

Ripple je razveljavil tudi trditve družbe SEC o prejšnjih zahtevah po izdelavi posnetkov z dne 25. januarja 2021. Obtoženi so trdili, da SEC ni posebej zahteval posnetkov do 5. avgusta 2021. Poleg tega je Ripple nasprotoval nejasni opredelitvi »dokumentov« SEC, s katero tožnik je obtoženim očital, da niso odkrili podatkov prek sestanka in posvetovanja. Ripple je opredelitev dokumentov SEC označil za "neprimerno široko" in povzročila proces odkrivanja, ki je "obremenjujoč in nesorazmeren".

"Pred 5. avgustom je SEC v svoje pretirano opredelitev" Dokumentov "v svojih prošnjah za predložitev (" RFP ") vključil le" magnetofonske posnetke "in" zvočne posnetke ", ne pa tudi nobenega od samih ponudb."

Sledil je odgovor na predlog pisma SEC o prisilnem odkritju, je Ripple vložil predlog za zapečatenje eksponatov in prepisov. Vendar se v skladu z dopisom Ripple SEC ne strinja s predlaganimi popravki obtoženca.

#XRPSkupnost #SECGov v. # Valovanje #XRP Ripple vloži zahtevo za zapečatenje nekaterih eksponatov in izvlečkov iz zapisov, ki so jih vložile stranke v zvezi s predlogom SEC za pospešitev produkcije video in avdio posnetkov sestankov osebja Ripple. pic.twitter.com/GImTvLfFVm

- James K. Filan 🇺🇸🇮🇪 (@FilanLaw) September 7, 2021

Naročite se na naše e-novice zastonj