암호화폐 규제는 어떻게 되나요?

Bitcoin Selloff and Comeback was Regulation Driven

Unless you’ve been under a rock over the past couple of weeks, you know that 비트코인 (BTC) got hammered recently and then made a heck of a comeback. See for yourself…

출처

While volatility and fundamental factors are always at play, the big reason for the selloff was likely the China ban on crypto. Then the big reason for the comeback was likely the reassurance from U.S. regulators that they will not be following China’s ban.

But that’s not all. It’s pretty clear that the comeback by BTC – and other cryptos – was due to the welcomed larger response from U.S. regulators: Not only will they not ban crypto, but they are also (finally) getting started with the job of figuring out how to regulate crypto. And in my book, that’s bullish on the entire sector.

여기에 의미하는 바가 있습니다.

Poor Regulator Needs to Change

I don’t know about you, but when I think about regulatory clarity in the U.S. surrounding cryptocurrencies and blockchain, one word comes to mind:

There ain’t none.

Ok, that’s three, and poor grammar to boot.

But the fact is that U.S. regulators have dragged their feet on just about every facet of how they’ll treat crypto. From the regulation of exchanges to tax policy to ETF approval, their inaction has been mind-blowing.

The good news is that soon may be changing.

출처

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Gary Gensler told Congress last week that he had no plans to ban cryptocurrencies. In fact, during the hearing, Rep. Ted Budd from North Carolina – a crypto advocate and member of the Congressional Blockchain Caucus – confronted the Chairman head-on and asked if the SEC had any plans to follow China’s lead and ban cryptocurrencies. Unfortunately, Gensler’s response was just as direct:

“No, that would be up to Congress.”

Gensler went on to say that crypto regulation should include the need to regulate exchanges. In fact, they should “come in and register.” When Rep. Himes pressed Gensler to provide clarity on decentralized (DEX) exchange regulation, Gensler said:

“소위 DeFi 플랫폼이라고 하는 분산형 플랫폼에도 중앙 집중식 프로토콜이 있습니다. 그리고 그들이 [중앙집중식 거래소]와 같은 방식으로 양육권을 갖지는 않지만, 그것이 우리가 최대한의 공공 정책을 얻을 수 있는 곳이라고 생각합니다.”

And it isn’t just Gensler and the SEC finally starting to do something about regulation: The Federal Reserve is also beginning to talk about getting up to speed.

출처

At a recent hearing of the House Financial Services Committee, Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell said that he had no intention to ban or limit the use of cryptocurrencies. But, again, Rep. Budd got right to the heart of the matter:

“So, Mr. Chairman, is it your intention to ban or limit the use of cryptocurrencies like we’re seeing in China?”

Powell replied, “No.”

But Powell added that stablecoins – which are cryptocurrencies pegged to government-issued currencies like the U.S. dollar — would be subject to regulation. Stablecoins…

“Are like money-market funds, they’re like bank deposits, but they’re to some extent outside the regulatory perimeter, and it’s appropriate that they be regulated.”

Powell also rolled back his July comments, saying that he had “misspoke” when he said that “you wouldn’t need stablecoins, you wouldn’t need cryptocurrencies if you had a digital U.S. currency.”

Crypto Regulation is a Good Thing… In Moderation

So, what are regulators likely to do?

First off, they need to get educated.

우리처럼 extensively discussed here at INO.com, the technologies, platforms, and use cases around cryptocurrencies and blockchain are wide and diverse. Understanding, for example, the basic, but huge, differences between 비트코인 (BTC) 과 이더리움 (ETH) – the two biggest cryptocurrencies out there – should immediately impress regulators with how complex and intricate these assets are.

So, before regulators begin to slap on layers of rules, they need to understand what these assets do. And I don’t have to tell you that they’re not anything like stocks, ETFs, mutual funds, or even futures. They are their own beast and need to be regulated as such.

Once regulators get a thorough understanding of blockchain and crypto, potential regulation will likely hover around a few hot topics, including stopping cryptocurrency crime, tax evasion, exchange regulation, stablecoin regulation, and investment vehicles like ETFs.

And the fact is, I would welcome any regulation in these areas.

Why? The answer is simple. Right now, it’s still the Wild West when it comes to crypto regulation. Rules are uncertain, murky, and poorly constructed. And while that lack of regulation may appeal to the egalitarian spirit of crypto, it scares investors. And when they’re scared, they’ll likely put their money in other asset classes. And that’s bad for the whole sector.

Regulators also need to figure out how they are going to define cryptocurrencies. Are cryptocurrencies a security? A currency? A commodity?

Furthermore, what agency is going to take up the regulatory job? The SEC? The Fed? The CFTC? If they don’t answer these questions correctly, regulation is likely headed into a quagmire surrounded by nasty agency turf wars.

웨인 부리 트
INO.com 기여자

공개 :이 기여자는이 기사에서 언급 한 암호 화폐를 소유 할 수 있습니다. 이 기사는 기고자 자신의 의견입니다. 상기 내용은 일반적인 정보 제공 목적으로 만 제공되는 의견 문제이며 투자 조언이 아닙니다. 이 기여자는 자신의 의견에 대해 보상을받지 않습니다 (INO.com 제외).

Source: https://www.ino.com/blog/2021/10/whats-up-with-crypto-regulation/