Advances in cell coculture membranes recapitulating in vivo microenvironments

• Duell B.L.
• et al.

Epithelial cell coculture models for studying infectious diseases: benefits and limitations.

J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2011; 2011852419

• Dietrich I.
• et al.

Differential cytokine expression in direct and indirect co-culture of islets and mesenchymal stromal cells.

Cytokine. 2022; 150155779

• Boos J.A.
• et al.

Microfluidic co-culture platform to recapitulate the maternal–placental–embryonic axis.

Adv. Biol. (Weinh). 2021; 5e2100609

• Shafiee S.
• et al.

Recent advances on cell-based co-culture strategies for prevascularization in tissue engineering.

Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021; 9745314

• Zhang Z.
• et al.

A temperature-based easy-separable (TempEasy) 3D hydrogel coculture system.

Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2022; 11e2102389

• Ryu S.
• et al.

Nanothin coculture membranes with tunable pore architecture and thermoresponsive functionality for transfer-printable stem cell-derived cardiac sheets.

ACS Nano. 2015; 9: 10186-10202

• Kim H.
• et al.

A novel 3D indirect co-culture system based on a collagen hydrogel scaffold for enhancing the osteogenesis of stem cells.

J. Mater. Chem. B. 2020; 8: 9481-9491

• Shahabipour F.
• et al.

Coaxial 3D bioprinting of tri-polymer scaffolds to improve the osteogenic and vasculogenic potential of cells in co-culture models.

J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A. 2022; 110: 1077-1089

• He D.
• Li H.

Biomaterials affect cell–cell interactions in vitro in tissue engineering.

J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2021; 63: 62-72

• Hwang S.T.
• et al.

The expansion of human ES and iPS cells on porous membranes and proliferating human adipose-derived feeder cells.

Biomaterials. 2010; 31: 8012-8021

• Chung H.H.
• et al.

Use of porous membranes in tissue barrier and co-culture models.

Lab Chip. 2018; 18: 1671-1689

• Jang Y.
• et al.

Transparent, nanoporous, and transferable membrane-based cell–cell paracrine signaling assay.

Adv. Mater. 2015; 27: 1893-1899

• Agrawal A.A.
• et al.

Porous nanocrystalline silicon membranes as highly permeable and molecularly thin substrates for cell culture.

Biomaterials. 2010; 31: 5408-5417

• Aengenheister L.
• et al.

An advanced human in vitro co-culture model for translocation studies across the placental barrier.

Sci. Rep. 2018; 8: 5388

• Costa A.
• et al.

Triple co-culture of human alveolar epithelium, endothelium and macrophages for studying the interaction of nanocarriers with the air-blood barrier.

Acta Biomater. 2019; 91: 235-247

• Gu M.J.
• et al.

Hydrolyzed fumonisin B1 induces less inflammatory responses than fumonisin B1 in the co-culture model of porcine intestinal epithelial and immune cells.

Toxicol. Lett. 2019; 305: 110-116

• Stone N.L.
• et al.

A novel transwell blood brain barrier model using primary human cells.

Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2019; 13: 230

• Gómez Álvarez-Arenas T.E.
• et al.

Ultrasound propagation in the micropores of track membranes.

Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005; 87111911

• Zhang Y.
• et al.

Co-culture systems-based strategies for articular cartilage tissue engineering.

J. Cell. Physiol. 2018; 233: 1940-1951

• Cho H.
• et al.

Engineered co-culture strategies using stem cells for facilitated chondrogenic differentiation and cartilage repair.

Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2018; 23: 261-270

• Kitaeva K.V.
• et al.

Cell culture based in vitro test systems for anticancer drug screening.

Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020; 8: 322

• Bray L.J.
• et al.

Addressing patient specificity in the engineering of tumor models.

Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2019; 7: 217

• Yang X.
• et al.

Nanofiber membrane supported lung-on-a-chip microdevice for anti-cancer drug testing.

Lab Chip. 2018; 18: 486-495

• Wang S.
• et al.

Near-physiological microenvironment simulation on chip to evaluate drug resistance of different loci in tumour mass.

Talanta. 2019; 191: 67-73

• Cai L.
• et al.

Comparison of cytotoxicity evaluation of anticancer drugs between real-time cell analysis and CCK-8 method.

ACS Omega. 2019; 4: 12036-12042

• Kwon S.P.
• et al.

Multilayered cell sheets of cardiac reprogrammed cells for the evaluation of drug cytotoxicity.

Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2021; 18: 807-818

• Deng J.
• et al.

A cell lines derived microfluidic liver model for investigation of hepatotoxicity induced by drug–drug interaction.

Biomicrofluidics. 2019; 13024101

• Park D.
• et al.

Integrating organs-on-chips: multiplexing, scaling, vascularization, and innervation.

Trends Biotechnol. 2020; 38: 99-112

• Carter R.N.
• et al.

Ultrathin transparent membranes for cellular barrier and co-culture models.

Biofabrication. 2017; 9015019

• Dohle E.
• et al.

Human co- and triple-culture model of the alveolar-capillary barrier on a basement membrane mimic.

Tissue Eng. Part C Methods. 2018; 24: 495-503

• Khire T.S.
• et al.

Finite element modeling to analyze TEER values across silicon nanomembranes.

Biomed. Microdevices. 2018; 20: 11

• Park S.M.
• et al.

Ultra-thin, aligned, free-standing nanofiber membranes to recapitulate multi-layered blood vessel/tissue interface for leukocyte infiltration study.

Biomaterials. 2018; 169: 22-34

• Salminen A.T.
• et al.

Ultrathin dual-scale nano- and microporous membranes for vascular transmigration models.

Small. 2019; 15e1804111

• Kim D.
• et al.

A collagen gel-coated, aligned nanofiber membrane for enhanced endothelial barrier function.

Sci. Rep. 2019; 9: 14915

• Yoo J.
• et al.

Augmented peripheral nerve regeneration through elastic nerve guidance conduits prepared using a porous PLCL membrane with a 3D printed collagen hydrogel.

Biomater. Sci. 2020; 8: 6261-6271

• Wang C.
• et al.

Novel microfluidic colon with an extracellular matrix membrane.

ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2018; 4: 1377-1385

• Zeng J.
• et al.

Fabrication of artificial nanobasement membranes for cell compartmentalization in 3D tissues.

Small. 2020; 16: 1907434

• Tibbe M.P.
• et al.

Microfluidic gel patterning method by use of a temporary membrane for organ-on-chip applications.

Adv. Mater. Technol. 2018; 3: 1700200

• Bayir E.
• et al.

The use of bacterial cellulose as a basement membrane improves the plausibility of the static in vitro blood–brain barrier model.

Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019; 126: 1002-1013

• Hudecz D.
• et al.

Ultrathin silicon membranes for in situ optical analysis of nanoparticle translocation across a human blood–brain barrier model.

ACS Nano. 2020; 14: 1111-1122

• Zakharova M.
• et al.

Transwell-integrated 2 μm thick transparent polydimethylsiloxane membranes with controlled pore sizes and distribution to model the blood–brain barrier.

Adv. Mater. Technol. 2021; 6: 2100138

• Rodriguez-Garcia A.
• et al.

3D in vitro human organ mimicry devices for drug discovery, development, and assessment.

Adv. Polym. Technol. 2020; 2020: 6187048

• Zamprogno P.
• et al.

Second-generation lung-on-a-chip with an array of stretchable alveoli made with a biological membrane.

Commun. Biol. 2021; 4: 168

• Yoo J.
• et al.

Use of elastic, porous, and ultrathin co-culture membranes to control the endothelial barrier function via cell alignment.

Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021; 31: 2008172

• Mireles M.
• et al.

Use of nanosphere self-assembly to pattern nanoporous membranes for the study of extracellular vesicles.

Nanoscale Adv. 2020; 2: 4427-4436

• Mondrinos M.J.
• et al.

Native extracellular matrix-derived semipermeable, optically transparent, and inexpensive membrane inserts for microfluidic cell culture.

Lab Chip. 2017; 17: 3146-3158

• Ryu S.
• et al.

Cellular layer-by-layer coculture platform using biodegradable, nanoarchitectured membranes for stem cell therapy.

Chem. Mater. 2017; 29: 5134-5147

• Song S.Y.
• et al.

Cardiac-mimetic cell-culture system for direct cardiac reprogramming.

Theranostics. 2019; 9: 6734-6744

• Song S.Y.
• et al.

Prevascularized, multiple-layered cell sheets of direct cardiac reprogrammed cells for cardiac repair.

Biomater. Sci. 2020; 8: 4508-4520

• Suhaeri M.
• et al.

Novel platform of cardiomyocyte culture and coculture via fibroblast-derived matrix-coupled aligned electrospun nanofiber.

ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2017; 9: 224-235

• Guduric V.
• et al.

Layer-by-layer bioassembly of cellularized polylactic acid porous membranes for bone tissue engineering.

J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2017; 28: 78

• Mohamed Ameer J.
• et al.

Fabrication of co-cultured tissue constructs using a dual cell seeding compatible cell culture insert with a clip-on scaffold for potential regenerative medicine and toxicological screening applications.

J. Sci. Adv. Mater. Devices. 2020; 5: 207-217

• Tan E.Y.S.
• et al.

Novel method for the fabrication of ultrathin, free-standing and porous polymer membranes for retinal tissue engineering.

J. Mater. Chem. B. 2017; 5: 5616-5622

• Paschos N.K.
• et al.

Advances in tissue engineering through stem cell-based co-culture.

J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2015; 9: 488-503

• Sun M.
• et al.

Advances in micro/nanoporous membranes for biomedical engineering.

Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2021; 10e2001545

• Gholizadeh S.
• et al.

Robust and gradient thickness porous membranes for in vitro modeling of physiological barriers.

Adv. Mater. Technol. 2020; 52000474

• Calejo M.T.
• et al.

Co-culture of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived retinal pigment epithelial cells and endothelial cells on double collagen-coated honeycomb films.

Acta Biomater. 2020; 101: 327-343

• DesOrmeaux J.P.
• et al.

Nanoporous silicon nitride membranes fabricated from porous nanocrystalline silicon templates.

Nanoscale. 2014; 6: 10798-10805

• Hill K.
• et al.

Second generation nanoporous silicon nitride membranes for high toxin clearance and small format hemodialysis.

Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2020; 9e1900750

• Nehilla B.J.
• et al.

Endothelial vacuolization induced by highly permeable silicon membranes.

Acta Biomater. 2014; 10: 4670-4677

• Mossu A.
• et al.

A silicon nanomembrane platform for the visualization of immune cell trafficking across the human blood–brain barrier under flow.

J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2019; 39: 395-410

• Chung H.H.
• et al.

Porous substrates promote endothelial migration at the expense of fibronectin fibrillogenesis.

ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2018; 4: 222-230

• Allahyari Z.
• et al.

Micropatterned poly(ethylene glycol) islands disrupt endothelial cell–substrate interactions differently from microporous membranes.

ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2020; 6: 959-968

• Tan X.
• Rodrigue D.

A review on porous polymeric membrane preparation. Part I. Production techniques with polysulfone and poly(vinylidene fluoride).

Polymers (Basel). 2019; 11: 1160

Track etching technique in membrane technology.

Radiat. Meas. 2001; 34: 559-566

• Chen Q.
• et al.

Microfluidic isolation of highly pure embryonic stem cells using feeder-separated co-culture system.

Sci. Rep. 2013; 3: 2433

• Quiros-Solano W.F.
• et al.

Microfabricated tuneable and transferable porous PDMS membranes for organs-on-chips.

Sci. Rep. 2018; 8: 13524

• Wu Q.
• et al.

Organ-on-a-chip: recent breakthroughs and future prospects.

Biomed. Eng. Online. 2020; 19: 9

• Lu W.
• et al.

Porous membranes in secondary battery technologies.

Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017; 46: 2199-2236

• Le-The H.
• et al.

Large-scale fabrication of free-standing and sub-μm PDMS through-hole membranes.

Nanoscale. 2018; 10: 7711-7718

• Laity P.R.
• et al.

Composition and phase changes observed by magnetic resonance imaging during non-solvent induced coagulation of cellulose.

Polymer. 2002; 43: 5827-5837