Gene drive in species complexes: defining target organisms

Site-specific selfish genes as tools for the control and genetic engineering of natural populations.

Proc. Biol. Sci. 2003; 270: 921-928

• Burt A.
• et al.

Gene drive to reduce malaria transmission in sub-Saharan Africa.

J. Responsible Innov. 2018; 5: S66-S80

• Wang G.H.
• et al.

Symbionts and gene drive: two strategies to combat vector-borne disease.

Trends Genet. 2022; 38: 708-723

• African Union Development Agency – New Partnership for Africa’s Development

Gene Drives for Malaria Control and Elimination in Africa.

2018

• World Health Organization

Evaluation of Genetically Modified Mosquitoes for the Control of Vector-Borne Diseases.

WHO, 2020

• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine

Gene Drives on the Horizon: Advancing Science, Navigating Uncertainty, and Aligning Research with Public Values.

National Academies Press, 2016

• Landis W.G.
• et al.

A general risk-based adaptive management scheme incorporating the Bayesian Network Relative Risk Model with the South River, Virginia, as case study.

Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 2017; 13: 115-126

• James S.
• et al.

Pathway to deployment of gene drive mosquitoes as a potential biocontrol tool for elimination of malaria in Sub-Saharan Africa: recommendations of a Scientific Working Group.

Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2018; 98: 1-49

• EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms
• et al.

Adequacy and sufficiency evaluation of existing EFSA guidelines for the molecular characterisation, environmental risk assessment and post-market environmental monitoring of genetically modified insects containing engineered gene drives.

EFSA J. 2020; 18e06297

• James S.L.
• et al.

Toward the definition of efficacy and safety criteria for advancing gene drive-modified mosquitoes to field testing.

Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2020; 20: 237-251

• World Health Organization

Guidance Framework for Testing Genetically Modified Mosquitoes.

2nd edn. WHO, 2021

• Ickowicz A.
• et al.

Predicting the spread and persistence of genetically modified dominant sterile male mosquitoes.

Parasit. Vectors. 2021; 14: 480

• Connolly J.B.
• et al.

Recommendations for environmental risk assessment of gene drive applications for malaria vector control.

Malar. J. 2022; 21: 152

• Romeis J.
• et al.

The value of existing regulatory frameworks for the environmental risk assessment of agricultural pest control using gene drives.

Environ. Sci. Policy. 2020; 108: 19-36

• Devos Y.
• et al.

Gene drive-modified organisms: developing practical risk assessment guidance.

Trends Biotechnol. 2021; 39: 853-856

• Devos Y.
• et al.

Potential use of gene drive modified insects against disease vectors, agricultural pests and invasive species poses new challenges for risk assessment.

Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2021; : 1-17

• Devos Y.
• et al.

Risk management recommendations for environmental releases of gene drive modified insects.

Biotechnol. Adv. 2021; 107807

• Davidson G.

Anopheles gambiae, a complex of species.

Bull. World Health Organ. 1964; 31: 625-634

• Besansky N.J.
• et al.

Semipermeable species boundaries between Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles arabiensis: evidence from multilocus DNA sequence variation.

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003; 100: 10818-10823

• Small S.T.
• et al.

Radiation with reticulation marks the origin of a major malaria vector.

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2020; 117: 31583-31590

• Antonio-Nkondjio C.
• Simard F.

Highlights on anopheles nili and anopheles moucheti, malaria vectors in Africa.

in: Anopheles Mosquitoes – New insights into Malaria Vectors. IntechOpen, 2013

• Crawford J.E.
• et al.

Reticulate speciation and barriers to introgression in the Anopheles gambiae species complex.

Genome Biol. Evol. 2015; 7: 3116-3131

• Thelwell N.J.
• et al.

Evidence for mitochondrial introgression between Anopheles bwambae and Anopheles gambiae.

Insect Mol. Biol. 2000; 9: 203-210

• Kyrou K.
• et al.

A CRISPR-Cas9 gene drive targeting doublesex causes complete population suppression in caged Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes.

Nat. Biotechnol. 2018; 36: 1062-1066

• Hammond A.
• et al.

Gene-drive suppression of mosquito populations in large cages as a bridge between lab and field.

Nat. Commun. 2021; 12: 4589

• Sinka M.E.
• et al.

The dominant Anopheles vectors of human malaria in Africa, Europe and the Middle East: occurrence data, distribution maps and bionomic precis.

Parasit. Vectors. 2010; 3: 117

• Afrane Y.
• et al.

Secondary malaria vectors of Sub-Saharan Africa: threat to malaria elimination on the continent?.

in: Rodriguez-Morales A.J. Current Topics in Malaria. IntechOpen, 2016

• Burt A.
• Crisanti A.

Gene drive: evolved and synthetic.

ACS Chem. Biol. 2018; 13: 343-346

• White G.B.

Chromosomal evidence for natural interspecific hybridization by mosquitoes of the Anopheles gambiae complex.

Nature. 1971; 231: 184-185

• Costantini C.
• et al.

Living at the edge: biogeographic patterns of habitat segregation conform to speciation by niche expansion in anopheles gambiae.

BMC Ecol. 2009; 9: 16

• Pombi M.
• et al.

Dissecting functional components of reproductive isolation among closely related sympatric species of the anopheles gambiae complex.

Evol. Appl. 2017; 10: 1102-1120

• Epopa P.S.
• et al.

Seasonal malaria vector and transmission dynamics in western Burkina Faso.

Malar. J. 2019; 18: 113

• Irish S.R.
• et al.

Updated list of anopheles species (Diptera: Culicidae) by country in the Afrotropical Region and associated islands.

Zootaxa. 2020; 4747 ()

• Kyalo D.
• et al.

A geo-coded inventory of anophelines in the Afrotropical Region south of the Sahara: 1898-2016.

Wellcome Open Res. 2017; 2: 57

• North A.R.
• et al.

Modelling the suppression of a malaria vector using a CRISPR-Cas9 gene drive to reduce female fertility.

BMC Biol. 2020; 18: 98

• Connolly J.B.
• et al.

Systematic identification of plausible pathways to potential harm via problem formulation for investigational releases of a population suppression gene drive to control the human malaria vector Anopheles gambiae in West Africa.

Malar. J. 2021; 20

• Lanzaro G.C.
• Lee Y.

Speciation in Anopheles gambiae – the distribution of genetic polymorphism and patterns of reproductive isolation among natural populations.

in: Manguin S. Anopheles Mosquitoes – New Insights into Malaria Vectors. IntechOpen, 2013

• Miles A.
• et al.

Genetic diversity of the African malaria vector Anopheles gambiae.

Nature. 2017; 552: 96-100

• Diabate A.
• Tripet F.

Targeting male mosquito mating behaviour for malaria control.

Parasit. Vectors. 2015; 8: 347

• Niang A.
• et al.

Does extreme asymmetric dominance promote hybridization between Anopheles coluzzii and Anopheles gambiae s.s. in seasonal malaria mosquito communities of West Africa?.

Parasit. Vectors. 2015; 8: 586

• Lang A.
• et al.

Selection of non-target Lepidoptera species to test Bt maize effects in the laboratory: which species and how to breed them?.

BioRisk. 2020; 15: 45-65

• Baudrot V.
• et al.

When the average hides the risk of Bt-corn pollen on non-target Lepidoptera: Application to Aglais io in Catalonia.

Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021; 207111215

• Meissle M.
• Romeis J.

Transfer of Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab proteins from genetically engineered Bt cotton to herbivores and predators.

Insect Sci. 2017; 25: 823-832

• Li Y.
• et al.

Bt rice in China – focusing the nontarget risk assessment.

Plant Biotechnol. J. 2017; 15: 1340-1345

• Harris A.F.
• et al.

Successful suppression of a field mosquito population by sustained release of engineered male mosquitoes.

Nat. Biotechnol. 2012; 30: 828-830

• Carvalho D.O.
• et al.

Suppression of a field population of Aedes aegypti in Brazil by sustained release of transgenic male mosquitoes.

PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2015; 9e0003864

• Gorman K.
• et al.

Short-term suppression of Aedes aegypti using genetic control does not facilitate Aedes albopictus.

Pest Manag. Sci. 2016; 72: 618-628

• White G.B.

Anopheles bwambae sp.n., a malaria vector in the Semliki Valley, Uganda, and its relationships with other sibling species of the An. gambiae complex (Diptera: Culicidae).

Syst. Entomol. 1985; 10: 501-522

• Benedict M.Q.
• et al.

Colonisation and mass rearing: learning from others.

Malar. J. 2009; 8: S4

• Ngowo H.S.
• et al.

Fitness characteristics of the malaria vector Anopheles funestus during an attempted laboratory colonization.

Malar. J. 2021; 20: 148

• Leftwich P.T.
• et al.

Genetic pest management and the background genetics of release strains.

Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 2021; 37620190805

• Charalambous M.
• et al.

Electrophoretic and DNA identification of Anopheles bwambae and A. gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae) in western Uganda.

Bull. Entomol. Res. 2007; 89: 111-117

• Clarkson C.S.
• et al.

Adaptive introgression between Anopheles sibling species eliminates a major genomic island but not reproductive isolation.

Nat. Commun. 2014; 5: 4248

• Norris L.C.
• et al.

Adaptive introgression in an African malaria mosquito coincident with the increased usage of insecticide-treated bed nets.

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2015; 112: 815-820

• Mancini E.
• et al.

Adaptive potential of hybridization among malaria vectors: introgression at the immune locus TEP1 between Anopheles coluzzii and A. gambiae in ‘Far-West’ Africa.

PLoS One. 2015; 10e0127804

• Clarke A.R.
• et al.

The ecology of Bactrocera tryoni (Diptera: Tephritidae): what do we know to assist pest management?.

Ann. Appl. Biol. 2011; 158: 26-54

• Edelman N.B.
• et al.

Genomic architecture and introgression shape a butterfly radiation.

Science. 2019; 366: 594-599

• Meier J.I.
• et al.

Ancient hybridization fuels rapid cichlid fish adaptive radiations.

Nat. Commun. 2017; 8: 14363

• Pyron R.A.
• et al.

Candidate-species delimitation in Desmognathus salamanders reveals gene flow across lineage boundaries, confounding phylogenetic estimation and clarifying hybrid zones.

Ecol. Evol. 2022; 12e8574

• Chan K.O.
• et al.

Species delimitation with gene flow: a methodological comparison and population genomics approach to elucidate cryptic species boundaries in Malaysian Torrent Frogs.

Mol. Ecol. 2017; 26: 5435-5450

• Barley A.J.
• et al.

The challenge of species delimitation at the extremes: diversification without morphological change in philippine sun skinks.

Evolution. 2013; 67: 3556-3572

• Lamichhaney S.
• et al.

Evolution of Darwin’s finches and their beaks revealed by genome sequencing.

Nature. 2015; 518: 371-375

• Song Y.
• et al.

Adaptive introgression of anticoagulant rodent poison resistance by hybridization between old world mice.

Curr. Biol. 2011; 21: 1296-1301

• Teng H.
• et al.

Population genomics reveals speciation and introgression between Brown Norway Rats and their sibling species.

Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017; 34: 2214-2228

• Adavoudi R.
• Pilot M.

Consequences of hybridization in mammals: a systematic review.

Genes (Basel). 2021; 13: 50

• Alphey L.S.
• et al.

Opinion: standardizing the definition of gene drive.

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2020; 117: 30864-30867

• Turner G.
• et al.

Means and ends of effective global risk assessments for genetic pest management.

BMC Proc. 2018; 12: 13

• World Health Organization

World Malaria Report.

WHO, 2021

• Hammond A.M.
• Galizi R.

Gene drives to fight malaria: current state and future directions.

Pathog. Glob. Health. 2018; 111: 412-423

• Hammond A.
• et al.

A CRISPR-Cas9 gene drive system targeting female reproduction in the malaria mosquito vector Anopheles gambiae.

Nat. Biotechnol. 2016; 34: 78-83

• Fontaine M.C.
• et al.

Mosquito genomics. Extensive introgression in a malaria vector species complex revealed by phylogenomics.

Science. 2015; 3471258524

• Sinka M.E.
• et al.

A global map of dominant malaria vectors.

Parasit. Vectors. 2012; 5: 69

• Lobo N.F.
• et al.

Unexpected diversity of Anopheles species in Eastern Zambia: implications for evaluating vector behavior and interventions using molecular tools.

Sci. Rep. 2015; 5: 17952

• Coetzee M.
• et al.

Anopheles coluzzii and Anopheles amharicus, new members of the Anopheles gambiae complex.

Zootaxa. 2013; 3619: 246-274

• Barron M.G.
• et al.

A new species in the major malaria vector complex sheds light on reticulated species evolution.

Sci. Rep. 2019; 9: 14753

• Riehle M.M.
• et al.

A cryptic subgroup of Anopheles gambiae is highly susceptible to human malaria parasites.

Science. 2011; 331: 596-598

• Crawford J.E.
• et al.

Evolution of GOUNDRY, a cryptic subgroup of Anopheles gambiae s.l., and its impact on susceptibility to Plasmodium infection.

Mol. Ecol. 2016; 25: 1494-1510

• Tennessen J.A.
• et al.

A population genomic unveiling of a new cryptic mosquito taxon within the malaria-transmitting Anopheles gambiae complex.

Mol. Ecol. 2021; 30: 775-790

• Davidson G.

Anopheles gambiae complex.

Nature. 1962; 196: 907

• Davidson G.

The five mating-types in the Anopheles gambiae complex.

Riv. Malariol. 1964; 43: 167-183

• Davidson G.
• et al.

The Anopheles gambiae complex.

in: Wright J.W. Pal R. Genetics of Insect Vectors of Disease. Elsevier, 1967: 211-250

• Coluzzi M.
• et al.

Chromosomal differentiation and adaptation to human environments in the Anopheles gambiae complex.

Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1979; 73: 483-497

• Temu E.A.
• et al.

Detection of hybrids in natural populations of the Anopheles gambiae complex by the rDNA-based, PCR method.

Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 1997; 91: 963-965

• della Torre A.
• et al.

Molecular evidence of incipient speciation within Anopheles gambiae s.s. in West Africa.

Insect Mol. Biol. 2001; 10: 9-18

• Lee Y.
• et al.

Spatiotemporal dynamics of gene flow and hybrid fitness between the M and S forms of the malaria mosquito, Anopheles gambiae.

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013; 110: 19854-19859

• Weetman D.
• et al.

Contemporary gene flow between wild An. gambiae s.s. and An. arabiensis.

Parasit. Vectors. 2014; 7: 345

• Neafsey D.E.
• et al.

Mosquito genomics. Highly evolvable malaria vectors: the genomes of 16 Anopheles mosquitoes.

Science. 2015; 3471258522

Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified animals.

EFSA J. 2013; 11: 3200