1 Post
The match-ups for Code A Season 2 have been announced! The eight winners will move on to Code S, joining the four seeded players (top four from the previous Code S Season), and four players who advanced directly from the qualifiers.
Korea (South)1532 Posts
Poor parting….
Really hate this new format
They need to seed players better. Forgg and Percival should not be playing each other while Parting vs zest is a thing…
First dark then zest..
Poor parting….
Really hate this new format
They need to seed players better. Forgg and Percival should not be playing each other while Parting vs zest is a thing…
This only happened because Zest lost to Keen.
China216 Posts
First dark then zest..
Poor parting….
Really hate this new format
They need to seed players better. Forgg and Percival should not be playing each other while Parting vs zest is a thing…
For this, you need to blame zest for coming out from the loser’s bracket. ForGG did perform relative well though.
Korea (South)1532 Posts
First dark then zest..
Poor parting….
Really hate this new format
They need to seed players better. Forgg and Percival should not be playing each other while Parting vs zest is a thing…
This only happened because Zest lost to Keen.
Ahhh gotcha. So there is some kind of seeding. Fair enough
190 Posts
France2245 Posts
190 Posts
On June 06 2021 03:52 Serimek wrote:
A GSL format with groups is what I want to see for this “Code A” tournament.
That was the previous format for Ro24, they changed to code A probably to shorten the code S season so that they can add in another Super Tournament.
On June 06 2021 03:52 Serimek wrote:
A GSL format with groups is what I want to see for this “Code A” tournament.
That was the previous format for Ro24, they changed to code A probably to shorten the code S season so that they can add in another Super Tournament.
They’ve been cutting players the past few years because the Korean pro player base is eroding and they want the name Code S to represent at least some standard of quality.
United Kingdom1257 Posts
On June 06 2021 03:49 tigera6 wrote:
But why Zest got Parting and Percival only got ForGG? They both got into code A through the last round of the qualifer. And Zest should have the “weaker” opponent.
Thats not true, Zest got through via loser bracket. ForGG got through via winner bracket and also won his seeding match.
The system is fair, Zest lost his shot.
Germany204 Posts
On June 06 2021 03:49 tigera6 wrote:
But why Zest got Parting and Percival only got ForGG? They both got into code A through the last round of the qualifer. And Zest should have the “weaker” opponent.
Thats not true, Zest got through via loser bracket. ForGG got through via winner bracket and also won his seeding match.
The system is fair, Zest lost his shot.
Thanks for stating some facts!
3420 Posts
Korea (South)1532 Posts
On June 06 2021 06:04 catplanetcatplanet wrote:
parting is so unlucky lol. I think he can take zest though
I feel like zest is half in the game too
he knows he could get pulled at any time for his military service
29 Posts
190 Posts
On June 06 2021 03:49 tigera6 wrote:
But why Zest got Parting and Percival only got ForGG? They both got into code A through the last round of the qualifer. And Zest should have the “weaker” opponent.
Thats not true, Zest got through via loser bracket. ForGG got through via winner bracket and also won his seeding match.
The system is fair, Zest lost his shot.
I was comparing Zest case to Percival, not ForGG. There were 4 guys who got the last 4 slots from the qualifier, and how the seeding were decided among those 4?
China216 Posts
On June 06 2021 03:49 tigera6 wrote:
But why Zest got Parting and Percival only got ForGG? They both got into code A through the last round of the qualifer. And Zest should have the “weaker” opponent.
Thats not true, Zest got through via loser bracket. ForGG got through via winner bracket and also won his seeding match.
The system is fair, Zest lost his shot.
I was comparing Zest case to Percival, not a ForGG. There were 4 guys who got the last 4 slots of the qualifier, and how the seeding were decided among those 4?
The second day of qualifier qualifies 3 players for each group, 2 from winners bracket and one from loser’s bracket, then the two from winner’s bracket plays a seeding match.
ForGG and PartinG came out from winner’s bracket and won the seeding watch, therefore they are “tier 1” player, zest and percival came out of the loser’s bracket, becoming the “tier 2” player.
“Tier 1” players are matched with a “Tier 2” player at random. PartinG got unlucky to have zest and ForGG got lucky and got percival. Over.
417 Posts
190 Posts
On June 06 2021 03:49 tigera6 wrote:
But why Zest got Parting and Percival only got ForGG? They both got into code A through the last round of the qualifer. And Zest should have the “weaker” opponent.
Thats not true, Zest got through via loser bracket. ForGG got through via winner bracket and also won his seeding match.
The system is fair, Zest lost his shot.
I was comparing Zest case to Percival, not a ForGG. There were 4 guys who got the last 4 slots of the qualifier, and how the seeding were decided among those 4?
The second day of qualifier qualifies 3 players for each group, 2 from winners bracket and one from loser’s bracket, then the two from winner’s bracket plays a seeding match.
ForGG and PartinG came out from winner’s bracket and won the seeding watch, therefore they are “tier 1” player, zest and percival came out of the loser’s bracket, becoming the “tier 2” player.
“Tier 1” players are matched with a “Tier 2” player at random. PartinG got unlucky to have zest and ForGG got lucky and got percival. Over.
So it was RANDOM, not seeding.I know about the Tier 1 and Tier 2 shit, but didnt know how they divide the players within each Tier further.
United States16253 Posts
United States3610 Posts
Source: https://tl.net/forum/starcraft-2/573826-code-a-season-2-brackets-june-14-21
